There
aren’t as many murals in my home town as I used to remember. In a segregated
town such as ours was a few decades back (and I’m not talking about
officially-sanctioned segregation, but instead, that which endures and
flourishes because it reflects socioeconomic differences), it was always the
case that the murals were found in the “Mexican” side of town. It was a marker
that distinguished us as a community.
These
particular murals are found on a wall next to the city park. The adjoining
businesses are a long-standing mechanics garage and, relative newcomer, a shop
for the selling and repair of lawn mowers. With regards to the latter, it seems
particularly incongruous that they have not taken steps to paint over the
murals. It is a shop that sells higher-end equipment, by makers such as John
Deere, by which I mean to suggest that this is equipment geared towards lots
with lawns that are considerably bigger than those found in adjoining
residential areas.
After
viewing the murals and thinking about them for a few days, I am struck by the
prevalence of images of violence, decay and death. Many of the figures seem to
be either mournful or angry, reflecting a tension and frustration that seems to
be little uplifting.
I’ve seen
murals in other spaces that project longing. There are images of doctors and
nurses and labor leaders, and idyllic park settings that capture an urging for
more open and verdant spaces, a locus amoenus where desires are fulfilled.
In these
murals we have murals that reflect on the pageant of Mexican and Chicano
history. We have a very, very dark Virgen
de Guadalupe, darker than any I have seen, and her visage seems to
communicate not so much a maternal abnegation but instead a type almost of
indifference. She is older as well.
There is a
figure of a white man with a luxuriant beard, one who seems at first glance to
be a Conquistador but without the trappings or the figure of an angry God until
one looks closely and determines that he must be the Mexican Prometheus, the
figure known as Quetzalcoatl.
Skulls
figure prominently, whether used to portray ancient Aztec warriors, dead soldiers, mournful mothers, exploitative plutocrats and yes, even jesters. Perhaps one could say that there is an equalizing impulse in the use of this motif, but also, one would have to highlight as well the way in which they are used to convey not only irony but also a sense of hopelessness. There is a certain spectacle that is conveyed with them, an
insistent drumbeat in the repetition of this motif that sounds as if it projects only one mournful note. It is characteristic, perhaps, of a feeling that overwhelmed these artists during this particular moment, these murals corresponding to the late 70s and early 80s, a moment of anger and pessimism that, like the seething tensions in Los Angeles, didn't find expression otherwise. There seems to be little hope in these angry or grimacing visages.
The soldier
in the pageant of Mexican history is missing a hand. Although the arm is
upraised, the absence of this hand also communicates futility, as if the ideals
of the Revolution are ephemeral, as if they had, indeed, been illusory. Is it a
reference to the missing hand of General Obregón, one of the heroes of the
Mexican revolution and one of the earliest consecrated leaders in its
aftermath?
The pachuco also seems angry as he stands
next to his lowrider. He is defiant, threatening, with a pose that seems to
convey a challenge. What a difference between him and the peasants, his forbearers,
in the preceding mural, they who seem almost helpless under the weight of a
historical struggle that seemed to prove so futile.
Skulls are
also defiant, of course. They represent a visage that is one of the “Mexican
masks” that characterize Mexican identity, if we recall Octavio Paz’s essay
from his collection El laberinto de la
soledad.
But skulls
only grimace, they don’t nurture, they accuse and the mock. Here, in the
references to a pre-Colombian Mexican past, the skulls seem threatening and even the grill of a lowrider car bears more than a striking resemblance to a skull. What we have is a catalogue of defiance and aggression, unfortunately, with little of the lyrical quality or the baroque exuberance of murals I have seen in other communities, for example, those painted in certain areas of East Los Angeles.
Perhaps we always have felt ourselves to be embattled. There was, to reiterate an earlier point, a de facto segregation in this town when we were young, and we felt as if we (by which I am referring to the Mexican and Chicano community) were in a subservient position. But it still strikes me that these murals seem dated.
Perhaps we always have felt ourselves to be embattled. There was, to reiterate an earlier point, a de facto segregation in this town when we were young, and we felt as if we (by which I am referring to the Mexican and Chicano community) were in a subservient position. But it still strikes me that these murals seem dated.
I’m not sure if muralismo or these themes of resistance and defiance, using this traditional iconography, hasn’t exhausted its power.
OGRomero © 2013
(Copyrighted by OGRomero, 2013)
No comments:
Post a Comment